|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reading 1 - Genesis 39 & 40
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
39v.8
- Joseph refused the ways of the world, because of the responsibility that
he bore to his master. Here we have an important principle. Look how often
it is recorded in Proverbs by the man who could claim first hand experience.
Prov.1:10,
2:10-19, 5:3-8, 6:20-25,29-33, 7:5,25-27, 9:13-18, 22:14 23:26-28. The
spiritual principle for ourselves is quite clear isn't it? Peter Cresswell |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
40
v.8 - We do well to remember that whatever method He chooses to use,
God in heaven reveals His secrets to men, and if we continue to search His
revealed word, we will find them, not by our own efforts, as such, but by
His unmerited permission. Gen.41:16,
Psa.25:14, Dan.2:28 Peter Cresswell |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ch
39 - The story of Joseph in Egypt is a wonderful picture of God's providence.
Notice :3
indicates that this was known by Joseph's master and :23
the comment is made again.
ch
40 - The dreams of the butler and baker and the way in which the butler
forgot Joseph - incredible in itself - further highlights the providence
of God. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
39:2 Whilst 'the Lord was with Joseph' we should not think that Joseph thought things were going well with him all the time he was in Egypt for even when he was in a position of authority beyond his wildest dreams he named one of his children (Genesis 41:51) as a reminder of his sorrow. 40:7
We are son taken with the way in which Joseph was able to interpret the
butler and baker's dreams that we may not notice that Joseph - as the
jailer - is actually concerned for the welfare of the prisoners in his
charge! |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Genesis
39 - Though
sold cruelly by his brothers into a strange land, with strange people
and strange customs, Joseph makes known his faith at a very early stage.
Potiphar, his master, soon recognises that this lad is unique. His manners
and ways are in complete accord with his testimony - v3.
The
chapter begins by informing us that Potiphar was "an officer of
Pharaoh, captain of the guard." Literally, the Hebrew here is
telling us, that Potiphar was "a eunuch, and the chief of the executioners."
[see Strongs]. No wonder Potiphar's wife cast her wandering
lustful eyes on this fresh young man with his strong physique. And a lesser
man than Joseph may well have reasoned that, "As it seems God does not
care, and I am a long way from home, and no-one cares for me anymore,
and Potiphar is not entire, and his wife desires me, and I am
young - Why not...?" What a contrast Joseph is here to his slightly older
brother Judah, whose exploits were recorded in Genesis
38.
v11
- Even when "Mrs Potiphar's" scheming mind organised well
arranged circumstances to fulfil her lusts, Joseph still maintained
his faithfulness. As he put it so well in v9,
"How can I do this great wickedness, and sin against God." Whilst
the committing of this sin would have been a sin against his own body
- 1
Corinthians 6:18, and a trespass against Potiphar himself, Joseph
rightly estimates that ultimately such action is a "sin against
God," as indeed, all transgression is - Numbers
32:23. Because of his faithfulness, and trust in the Almighty, Joseph
remained a "eunuch for the kingdom of heavens sake" - Matthew
19:12 - and was ultimately elevated to being co-ruler of the then
known world - Genesis
41:39-45. God will reward the faithfulness of all HIS servants with
elevated positions in the coming Kingdom of Glory - Matthew
25:34.
Cliff York |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reading 2 - Psalm 44
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
v.2
- 'plantedst' refers to Israel, not the heathen. It is Israel that
God has 'planted'. The word here is nata`
- it is used of planting gardens (eg Eden Gen.2:8)
but only planting with a very long term view. This word would be used of
a tree but not of a flowerbed. It carries the idea of deeprooted establishment.
See the use in Gen.21:33,
Exo. 15:17, Num.24:6 Peter Cresswell |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
v.6-8
We have an insight here into the mind of that man who was a 'man after God's
own heart'. Here this man of war - this great and mighty warrior, who shed
too much blood in his life to be allowed to build the place where God would
choose to place his name there (or at least not physically) - places all
his trust, not on his weapons, but on his God. Peter Cresswell |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In remembering
how God had delivered His people in the past :1-3
the Psalmist is providing a good example for us to follow. We must think
about the way that God has worked in our lives in the past so that we can
have confidence that He will work in our lives in our present situations. Peter Forbes |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reading 3 - Matthew 26
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
v.6-13
- This action is rated with importance by Jesus, so much so that v.13
says that the story should be put on record for all time. Why? Well, the
reason comes out in Luke
7:44-50, which,
although in a different time period in its recording, appears to be a parallel
account. It is a pattern for us of the way in which we too obtain forgiveness
and peace through faith and devotion to God and the Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus
warns his disciples 'not
to trouble her'.
We have the same protection, and there is strong punishment for those that
do it - Gal.5:12. Peter Cresswell |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
v1
- 'and it came to pass' marks a break point in Matthew's Gospel
account and is found of five occasions. Matthew
7:28 11:1 13:53 19:1 (26:1)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
:11
In commenting about the poor always being with them Jesus is not making
a callous comment and being selfish. Rather he is presenting a Biblical
principle - he is quoting Deuteronomy
15:11. Deuteronomy 15 speaks of the year of release and how 'open handed'
the Jews were to be. Judas was not manifesting this spirit and so the rebuke
from Jesus was most appropriate Peter Forbes |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
:39
In his prayer when Jesus says 'not my will but thine' he is echoing the
sentiments of David when he fled from Absalom and Zadok brought the ark
to him (2
Samuel 15:26) Peter Forbes |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After
Jesus instituted the Last Supper with his 12 disciples, Judas departed to
carry out his evil plan. Jesus tells the 11 disciples that they will all
fall away, because of him; he tells them that: "he (God) will strike the
shepherd (Jesus), and the sheep (disciples) of the flock will be scattered"
RSV Bible. This is familiar language to us English readers. Suppose we read
the same verse in a French language Bible: This language has genders, and
when we read 'sheep' the word is 'brebis' and it means feminine sheep (ewes).
Jesus is talking to men, so why do the French translators use the female
gender? these French translators use the same source as the RSV translators;
so we need to search a bit further for more evidence for the answer. John
1:29 and 36: John saw Jesus approaching him and he said to disciples
standing nearby: "Behold the lamb of God", the French version Bible says
'agneau' , agneau is the masculine word for sheep. Now there are 2 words
for sheep. Readers you will see the difference between the 2 words: there
can be only one person, Jesus who is "the lamb of God" . all other believers
who accept this fact as a true statement, must be classed as sheep (feminine
gender). Another title used of Jesus is: "the Bridegroom", and the true
followers of Jesus are called "the Bride of Christ". There are numerous
references in the Bible to 'the sheep', each time in the French "Segond
Version of the Bible", it uses 'brebis' as
the word for sheep; likewise, when it has reference to the 'lamb of God'
it uses the word 'agneau' . Beryl Butler. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANOINTED As Jesus sat at the table in the hose of Simon the Leper, a woman came to him with a very expensive jar of perfume, which she poured on his head. Jesus described this action by saying, "She has done a beautiful thing to me." None of his disciples had done anything like that for him - in fact, they complained about the waste of money in that it could have been given to the poor. But Jesus meant more to her than all the poor in the world and so she expressed her love in the best way she could and anointed him in preparation of his burial. Jesus reply to his disciples did not excuse them (or us) from looking after the poor, but what he said put our priorities into perspective. Jesus must come first in our lives above all else. He must be the center of our affection as he was to the woman with the ointment. And even though Jesus is in heaven and not physically with us, we can still anoint him ourselves. We anoint him by pouring out our love on him, by praying to him, by serving him the best we can, by praising him and by bringing others to him. Take a moment to feel her passion as she anointed her Lord. Now we must anoint him ourselves with all the love we can. May we too, do beautiful things for him. Robert Prins |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Matthew
26 - There
are a number of sections in this record that contrast one with the other.
For example, v1-5
could
be entitled "Conspiracy of Hatred" while the next section,
v6-13
could be entitled "The Aroma of Love." vs
14-16 describes "A Covenant of Hatred" while vs17-29
describe Christ's great "The Covenant of Love" remembered
regularly by His disciples in the Breaking of Bread.
v3
- "Caiaphas" - A leader in Israel who, it appears, will
be resurrected by Jesus at His return - v64.
His character is such that he may well deserve the epithet, "Caiaphas
the Callous." He was the Jewish high priest (A.D. 27-36) at the beginning
of our Lord's public ministry, in the reign of Tiberius - Luke
3:2, and also at the time of his condemnation and crucifixion - Matthew
26:3, Matthew 26:57; John 11:49; John 18:13, John 18:14. He held this
office during the whole of Pilate's administration. His wife was the daughter
of Annas, who had formerly been high priest, and Caiaphas was probably
the deputy (Heb. sagan) of Caiaphas. He was of the sect of
the Sadducees - Acts
5:17, and was a member of the council when he gave his opinion that
Jesus should be put to death "for the people, and that the whole
nation perish not" - John
11:50. In these words, he unconsciously uttered a prophecy. "Like
Saul, he was a prophet in spite of himself." Caiaphas had no power to
inflict the punishment of death, and therefore Jesus was sent to Pilate,
the Roman governor, that he might duly pronounce the sentence against
him - Matthew
27:2; John 18:28. At a later period his hostility to the gospel is
still manifest - Acts
4:6. This high handed (false) high priest committed suicide when
he was deposed by Rome around 2 years after the death of Christ.
Cliff York |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||