|
|||||
Reading 1 - Exodus 21
|
|||||
v.5,6
- The idea that here there was an instruction to use the judges means that
this institution, which appears (ch.18:17-24)
to have come from Moses' father-in-law, obviously had God's blessing. God
is therefore not averse to man making judgements, though the men have to
be well chosen to stand the responsibility and to give spiritually correct
answers. As well as this, here in v.6
we have a picture of lifelong commitment, requiring the sacrifice of substantial
pain (albeit short term). Notice that the serving for ever was motivated
by his love for his master (God), his spouse (Jesus) and his children (Brethren
and Sisters). Ps.40:6-8
(the word opened in v.6
means to dig or excavate - clearly a reference back to today's chapter). Peter Cresswell |
|||||
v.17
represents the respect that God expects us to show for our parents - as
a training ground for the showing of respect to our Heavenly father. The
rules regarding respect for parents seem much harsher than most others,
and serious consequences ensue from what seem on the surface to be relatively
less serious crimes. We must consider what God is meaning us to learn from
this. Peter Cresswell |
|||||
v.5-6
The way in which the way a servant could dedicate himself to his master
forms a pattern of our service to God. This was exemplified in the way in
which Jesus gave himself over to his Father's work. So the idea :6
of the pierced ear is taken up in Psalm
40:6 and then on into Hebrews
10:5. Peter Forbes |
|||||
The
provision regarding the servant is the provision of the year of release
which is developed in more detail in Leviticus
25. Peter Forbes |
|||||
On
this day in 1861, Bro Thomas wrote the preface to the first volume of
Eureka.
Exodus
21 - The laws in this chapter relate to the fifth and sixth commandments;
and though they differ from our times and customs, nor are they binding
on us, yet they explain the moral law under which Israel now found herself,
and the rules of natural justice. The servant, in the state of servitude,
was an emblem of that state where man finds himself in bondage to
sin. The law, brings man face to face with his God, because
by his sins he is robbing God of his glory. However, the Law is based
on "Not" teaching. That is, man learns under the Law largely what
God is NOT. However, in God's Grace through Jesus Christ, we
have learned what God IS. So this, says Jesus, "is life eternal
that they might KNOW THEE the only true God and Jesus Christ whom thou
hast sent" - John
17:3. Likewise, back in Exodus 21, a servant in being made
free, was an emblem of that liberty wherewith Christ, the Son of
God, makes free from bondage His people, who are now free indeed - Romans
8:1; and made so freely, without money and without price, through the
grace of God -
John 8:32.
Cliff York |
|||||
Reading 2 - Psalm 74
|
|||||
v.2
- Lots of connections here throughout the scripture. Israel were (and we
now are as well) God's congregation, God's holy people, the redeemed of
the Lord (Isa.51:11)
- who also come to Zion - the place where we can dwell with God - Jesus.
It was purchased by God - purchased of course by the blood of Jesus (Acts
20:28). Let us
remind ourselves of the position of great privilege in which we find ourselves
- Ps.33:12,
Deut.4:20, 32:9, Jer.10:16, Isa.62:12, Tit.2:14, Rev.5:9. Peter Cresswell |
|||||
v.1
(Title) - This Asaph was son of Berechiah - and was the chief (1Chr.15:17-19,
16:5) of David's musicians. Was this Psalm (and Psalm 78) written by him,
or written for him? If it was for him , then that would not be the first
time - 1Chr.16:7 Peter Cresswell |
|||||
In
this Psalm the Psalmist thinks about the way that God brought Israel from
Egypt. Here are some of the verbal allusions. :1 anger smoke Deuteronomy 29:20 :2 which thou hast purchased Exodus 15:16 :11 Plucked out of thy bosom Exodus 4:7 :13 Divide the sea Exodus 14:21 :14 meat to the people Numbers 14:9 Peter Forbes |
|||||
David
is thinking like this because the sanctuary is desolate (:1-9).
This prompts the Psalmist to question why God does not seem interested (:10) Peter Forbes |
|||||
Psalm
74 - It appears almost certain that this Psalm is from Hezekiah's
time, when the Assyrian went through the land destroying all Israel's
places of worship.
Psalm
74:4-6 - NEB translates "The shouts of Thy enemies filled
the Holy Place, they planted their standards there as tokens of victory.
They brought it crashing down, like woodmen plying their axes in the forest;
they ripped the carvings clean out, they smashed them with hatchet and
pick." Obviously this was a traumatic time for the nation as
the enemy went throughout the land, destroying all that Israel had established.
Sadly the people in the land must once more endure the Assyrian, the Northern
Confederacy headed by Russia, going through the land and wreaking havoc
in their final rampage against God's people - Daniel
11:40-45.
Cliff York |
|||||
Reading 3 - Mark 7
|
|||||
v.7
- This has been a problem throughout the ages. Human nature adores tradition.
We feel great security in repeated ritual. It is essential, as Jesus says
here, that we separate in our minds those things which are doctrine from
those which are tradition and give each its true place in our hearts. From
the start God was concerned that his commandments remained untouched by
human thinking (Deut.12:32).
So let us heed carefully the message of passages like Tit.3:9,
Jas.1:26, Col.2:20-23, Rev.22:18. Peter Cresswell |
|||||
v.13
That it is possible to make the word of God void and of none effect by
the way that we make our own rules should really make us careful about
how we make our own rules to 'make life easy' for ourselves. |
|||||
:6-7
The way in which the 'people' were vain in their worship because they had
replaced the things God required by their own traditions should serve as
a powerful warning to us.
We must
ask ourselves, with respect to all the procedures that we adopt in our
lives, whether they accord with what Scripture teaches or whether the
procedures are designed to enable us to avoid thinking about the will
of our Father and how it should be implemented in our daily and ecclesial
lives. |
|||||
:24-30
It may seem puzzling that Jesus went to gentile territory and then, when
the gentile woman asked Jesus to heal her daughter. It might seem reasonable
to ask 'why go there if he was not going to heal anyone or preach the gospel?'
The way that Jesus responded was designed to enable the woman to show that
she had great faith. Not for her benefit but for the benefit of those Jews
that were with Jesus. Peter Forbes |
|||||
RULES
AND TRADITIONS Most rules and traditions have their basis in a principle or a belief. For example, the rule that says we should wear safety glasses when using power tools is based on the safety principle of "prevention is better than cure." The rule is good in its self, but if the principle is better served by wearing a face shield, then the rule of wearing safety glasses becomes obsolete. The Pharisees had made traditions and rules around the principles given in the Law of Moses. Essentially they were a hedge around the law to prevent people from breaking the law, and in a way, it worked well. But in other ways it went too far because the people lost sight of God's laws due to all the other rules they had to watch out for. Jesus said to them, "You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to the traditions of men." (Mark 7 v 8). We too can be governed by a multitude of rules and traditions intended to help us serve God, but which occasionally become a burden or hindrance. Our worship music, Bible Version, dress code, times of meetings, order of services or layout of a plan are all things that are based on principles yet are often enforced by rules. So let us consider the principles behind the rules and re-evaluate our standing before God. Robert Prins |
|||||
Mark
7:19 - "purging all meats" - Another translation
has this, "Making all meats clean." The NKJV has "Thus purifying
all foods" - This was a radical departure from 1500 years of
ingrained and inbred tradition and Law. It was a total shock to the mind
of the Jew, and we find Peter still grappling with the concept years later
in the record of the Acts.
Cliff York |
|||||