|
|||||||||
Reading 1 - 1Kings 9
|
|||||||||
v.3
- Quite clearly it was not the physical building that would last for ever,
but the kingdom and the power of God that was represented in the temple.
This temple lasts for ever only through Christ, and through him we too
are and will be part of its everlasting nature. Eph.2:21,
4:13-16.
Peter Cresswell |
|||||||||
v.22
provides an interesting contrast to yesterday's Jeremiah comment Peter Cresswell |
|||||||||
v.25
- These are the passages where we are told that 'three times in a year'
the males were to present themselves. Exodus
23:14,17 Deuteronomy 16:16.
And we see the only occasion during the time of the kings when this is
recorded as having happened. 1
Kings 9:25 2 Chronicles 8:13 |
|||||||||
9:7-9 In quoting Deuteronomy Solomon, by the Spirit, I showing Israel how that the words of Moses have been fulfilled in their lives because of their faithlessness. This, then became an exhortation and warning for the future.
|
|||||||||
:4
In calling Solomon to 'walk before me' God is asking Solomon to be like
Abraham (Genesis
17:1) Whilst Abraham walked through the land Solomon was settled in
that same land. The 'walk' was not a physical walking through the land.
It was a way of life. Peter Forbes |
|||||||||
1Ki
9:13 Cabul we often too readily assume means something like
disgusting. We should first remember Hirams character,
he was ever a lover of David and had worked for Solomon for
20yrs
(v1). See 2Sa 5:11, 1Ki 5:1-2, 7-8, 10. I suggest his unhappiness at these 20 cities (one for each year of his service to Solomon v1) was not because of any shortcoming in the cities but because he saw them as implying payment for services rendered, service which had been readily and freely given out of love for David and his God. Now see Ps 105:18 where the same Heb. word cabul [03525] is translated as fetters [03521] which had been applied to Joseph when in Egypt. Hiram
sees these cities as fetters binding him as a slave to Solomon.
So, as you cannot refuse a gift of cities, he sends Solomon payment for
them, he is no longer under obligation. For all Solomons wisdom
he was not always good at man-management and could cause offence.
We must too learn to read peoples feelings and motives. |
|||||||||
Reading 2 - Jeremiah 35
|
|||||||||
v.14
- The Rechabites, who were Kenites, and therefore included into the Children
of Israel because of their relation by marriage to Moses (Judges
1:16), were the
descendants of Rechab who was the father of Jonadab. They were obviously
a people with great regard to tradition and the like, as they had, for some
generations, kept this vow of drinking no wine and being nomadic in their
nature. They are then used as an example to the rest of Israel. Peter Cresswell |
|||||||||
v.8-10
tells us that these folk lived a very strict life - a life of discipline
and self-denial. Peter Cresswell |
|||||||||
The
way in which Yahweh uses the Rechabites to instruct the men of Judah is
a powerful lesson for us. Would God be able to point us out as examples
of obedience to the will of our Father for others to copy? Peter Forbes |
|||||||||
35:7-9
The way in which the Rechabites dwelt as strangers - for that is what is
implied in being tent dwellers - shows that they held to their life style
because, like Abraham, they realised they were strangers and pilgrims (Hebrews
11:13) which was a very pertinent point for those who did not want to
go to Babylon. Peter Forbes |
|||||||||
In
learning that Jeremiah is speaking in the time of Jehoiakim we have gone
back in time from the previous chapters. Jeremiah's prophecy is not recorded
in chronological order though obviously his message was delivered chronologically
there must be a reason for the ordering of the chapters in the prophecy
differently from the order in which the words were spoken. Whilst I have
no explanation for this we would be better employed finding that reason
rather than trying to 'organise' Jeremiah's prophecy into the 'correct'
order. Peter Forbes |
|||||||||
OBEDIENCE
One of the qualities God looks for in his people, almost above all else, is obedience. Several times in the Bible we read quotes like, "To obey is better than sacrifice." In the time of Jeremiah there was just about no-one who obeyed God. But one family, the Recabites, were an exception to the rule. Their Father had given them some instructions that they must not drink wine, build houses, plant vineyards, but always live as nomads in tents. The Recabites did exactly as they were commanded. When Jeremiah was told to test them and make them drink wine, they refused, choosing instead to obey their father. So God lifted them up as an example to faithless Israel showing that the Recabites were commended and blessed for obeying their natural father, when the children of Israel wouldn't obey either their God or their natural parents. The Recabites were given the promise of serving God for ever because of their faithfulness. Obedience is still that quality that God wants from us. So let us follow the example of the Recabites, to be committed, obedient and faithful for the rest of our lives. Robert Prins |
|||||||||
Reading 3 - Mark 9
|
|||||||||
v.3
- 'shining' and 'white as snow' link us back to Psa.104:1,2
and Dan.7:9,
and forward to the resurrected Christ in Matt.28:3,
Paul's vision in Acts
9:3-5 and Cornelius'
vision in Acts
10:30. Peter Cresswell |
|||||||||
In each
gospel that speaks of it, the transfiguration immediately follows the
promise of not tasting death before seeing the kingdom of the Son of man.
And not only so, but Peter:- 2
Peter 1:16.
When speaking of this scene, declared that it was a manifestation of the
power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. He says that the word of prophecy
was confirmed to them by the view of His majesty; so that they knew that
whereof they spoke, in making known to them the power and the coming of
Christ, having beheld His majesty. In fact it is precisely in this sense
that the Lord speaks of it here... It was a sample of the glory in which
He would come, given to confirm the faith of His disciples in the prospect
of His death which He had just announced to them. 'The Son of man coming
in His kingdom' is a reference to the vision of:- Daniel
7:13,14 |
|||||||||
:12
When Peter, James and John, said, speaking of Elijah, that he 'cometh first
and restoreth all things' we have a phrase which is picked up in the early
preaching of the apostles - [Acts
4:21] The 'restoration' spoken of the is the establishing again of the
kingdom of God - this was the issue in the minds of Jesus after his resurrection
[Acts
1:6]. That the kingdom is to be 'restored' of course, indicates that
it used to exist, which it did when the kingdom of Israel was on the earth. Peter Forbes |
|||||||||
:4
There is only one other place in Scripture where Moses and Elijah are mentioned
together (Malachi
4:4-5) which may well have fuelled the disciples questioning about the
coming of Elijah (9:11) Peter Forbes |
|||||||||
What
does Jesus mean about cutting off the hand, or the foot, or gouging out
the eye? Here in verses
42-50 Jesus repeats the same symbol three times with different parts
of the body, and each time quotes a passage from Isaiah
66v24 "Their worm does not die, And the fire is not quenched".
Jesus uses two symbols to demonstrate the destruction that will come upon someone who causes "one of these little ones to stumble". Being thrown into the water (v42), or being thrown into the fire (v43, 45, 47). Earlier in the chapter, we have a boy who had been thrown into the fire and water by an evil spirit to destroy him (v22). The malady
of the people of Israel, and the boy, was the same. The Israelites were
going to be destroyed by the judgment that God was about to pour upon
them for their sinfulness. We know this is the context, because Jesus
quotes Isaiah 66 which speaks of this. Likewise, the boy was going to
die at the hands of this spirit. Both of them desperately needed the intervention
of Christ. |
|||||||||